What best number of individuals. john stuart approach

What is ethics? At its least difficult, morals is an arrangement of good standards. They influence how individuals settle on choices and lead  their lives. Morals is worried about what is useful for people and society and is likewise depicted as good philosophy.The term is taken from  the Greek word ethos which can mean community, era, custom, propensity or attitude.Dilemmas which ethics covers are the following :how a  person can life a good life, his responsibilities and rights, the language of wrong and right and moral decisions like what is bad and good?. There are several ways to approach ethics but the most widely used approachs are based on Deontology, Virtue ethics and consequentialism.The  Firstly Deontology approach is a way to deal with morals in which profound quality is controlled by one’s adherance to obligation or laws.  Kantian morals is a deontological approach. In Kantian morals the main activities that are moral are those performed out of one’s obligation  to take after the ethical law. secondly the Virtue ethics approach, here the emphasis is on demonstrating ideals, or character as opposed to  on particular moral acts. Moral activities are performed by moral, prudent, moral individuals, so the attention is on being a decent  individual. Aristotelian morals utilizes temperance morals; here the most elevated good great is to have certain characters qualities.Lastly  the Consequentialism Here the emphasis isn’t on rules, but instead on the consquences. So, the closures can legitimize the methods.  Utilitarianism is a consequentiist approach; here what is moral is the thing that conveys the best satisfaction to the best number of  individuals. john stuart approach is most firmly based on the utilitarianism  ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’  this saying is to be utilized when judging whether any activity is correct or off-base. at a sound judgment level, it appears that this sort of reasoning for example the capacity to look forward and think about the aftereffects of our activities, is the thing that many individuals need from their government, from their family, from their companions, from their close oneand  even from their own particular conduct. they ask, that by conducting this or that act, what exactly is gonna happen? will it be resulting in any harm or any help to others ? Moreover, even if it results in a greater good for majority of the population but how do we protect the minority from getting harmed out of it, as  some people considered it wrong or ethical in their views that minorities should be sacrificed for the greator good when one person’s happiness involves someone else’s unhappiness. The global superpowers such as USA and Japan are the examples of such ethical miseries. USA despite of having surplus production of corn, never donate it to countries , where human population is dying due to shortage of food. They instead dump the surplus corn into the oceans. Likewise Japan dump their surplus supply of rice. Another similar example is of Netherlands, where they dump surplus milk in oceans but never give it to the deserving nations. They all do so , just in order to maintain the forces of demand and supply. If found in abundance, it might lead to price reduction , which will induce lesser benefits to capitalistic monsters.